Improving AI Governance for Stronger University Compliance and Innovation

Improving AI Governance for Stronger University Compliance and Innovation

• By Damien Eversmann
• 05/07/25

As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes more integrated into higher education, universities must adopt robust governance practices to ensure AI is used responsibly. AI can generate valuable insights for higher education institutions and it can be used to enhance the teaching process itself. The caveat is that this can only be achieved when universities adopt a strategic and proactive set of data and process management policies for their use of AI.

Unique Data Challenges in Higher Education

Higher education faces unique data challenges stemming from both regulatory requirements and the operational structure of universities. On the regulatory side, institutions must comply with a variety of frameworks. These include the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) for student data privacy, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) for medical schools, and the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) for financial transactions. Regional regulations may also apply, such as the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) for data protection.

Federal requirements related to accepting government funding for research further complicate compliance efforts. Academic institutions may have multiple layers of internal policies to address these regulatory requirements, with multiple levels of oversight that may include faculty-senate or board-level buy-in. This creates a complex environment in which universities can struggle to balance strict regulatory compliance with their own data management practices.

Against this backdrop, data governance is about more than just security; it also encompasses data quality, management practices, and clearly defined roles and responsibilities. This expansive view of governance is needed to match AI's expansive reach into virtually every aspect of university operations.

Key Priorities for AI Governance

To improve data governance and AI utilization in higher education, institutions should focus on several key priorities. One critical area is data privacy and ensuring that AI systems operate effectively without inserting sensitive student data into models. Techniques such as retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and graph-based AI approaches allow institutions to utilize AI-driven insights while maintaining strict privacy controls.

Institutions should also explore privacy-preserving AI techniques, such as federated learning, which enables AI models to be trained on decentralized data without exposing sensitive information. Synthetic data generation is another valuable approach, allowing institutions to create lifelike datasets that support AI research and development while safeguarding real student data. By leveraging these methods, higher education institutions can maintain high levels of data privacy while maximizing AI's potential to enhance student success.

Accountability is another major priority. Treating AI as an actor in governance policies ensures transparency in decision-making, reinforcing ethical AI adoption across all academic processes. For example, AI can analyze application packages, assisting with decision-making by identifying patterns in successful applications. AI-driven chatbots can also support applicants throughout the admissions process by answering questions and guiding them through submission requirements, but these capabilities should be backed up with a transparent and easily documented chain of logic to ensure process compliance. 

Strong AI Governance Drives Innovation Across the University

Transformation teams in higher education recognize that the above priorities and techniques in managing AI must be supported by the right modernization steps at the systems and infrastructure level. Platforms must be designed to break across traditional data silos to provide flexibility in integrating AI solutions across various academic departments and ensuring that governance frameworks are consistently applied throughout.