Prince Harry 'gutted' to lose U.K. security decision, confirms no communication with King Charles

11 hours ago 2
ARTICLE AD BOX

World·New

Prince Harry told the BBC it was "impossible for me to take my family back to the U.K. safely" after he lost his legal challenge to the British government on Friday changing his security arrangements after he stepped down from royal duties.

Duke of Sussex called on Labour government to review the security arrangements

Thomson Reuters

· Posted: May 02, 2025 1:48 PM EDT | Last Updated: 12 minutes ago

A red-haired man with a beard in a suit and tie is shown in closeup.

Britain's Prince Harry is shown on April 9 outside the High Court in London amid his ongoing legal battle over security protection. (Isabel Infantes/Reuters)

Prince Harry told the BBC it was "impossible for me to take my family back to the U.K. safely" after he lost his legal challenge to the British government on Friday changing his security arrangements after he stepped down from royal duties.

King Charles's younger son, the Duke of Sussex unsuccessfully sought to overturn a decision by the Home Office — the ministry responsible for policing — which decided in 2020 he would not automatically receive the highest level of personal police protection in Britain.

The prince told the BBC in an interview conducted in the U.S. that he was "pretty gutted about the decision."

"We thought it was going to go our way, but it certainly has proven that there was no way to win this through the courts," said Harry.

The decision was originally made under a Conservative government. Harry said there was nothing legally preventing the Labour government of Prime Minister Keir Starmer from stepping in to review the decision.

"I would ask the prime minister to step in. I would ask Yvette Cooper, the home secretary, to look at this very, very carefully," he told the BBC.

Harry said he still hoped for a reconciliation with members of his family, but he said his father "won't speak to me because of this security stuff," and that he was unaware of the status of the King's recovery from a cancer diagnosis.

'I am who I am'

Harry, 40, told the BBC that whether he is fulfilling royal duties or not, he is still a member of a high-profile family and his security requirements are not that of a typical private citizen. He pointed out that prime ministers and other high-profile officials, rightly, in his view, receive the highest level of security protection long after their years of public service.

"My status hasn't changed — it can't change," he said. "I am who I am, I am part of what I am part of, I can't escape that."

WATCH l Harry wins tabloid battle, but not without compromise:

Prince Harry settles U.K. tabloid lawsuit for ‘substantial’ damages, apology

Prince Harry will receive ‘substantial’ damages after settling a lawsuit with Rupert Murdoch’s News Group Newspapers, which publishes the U.K. tabloid The Sun and others. He also received an apology for ‘serious intrusion’ into his private life using unlawful means.

Harry and his American wife Meghan Markle married at Windsor Castle in May 2018. Within two years the couple quit royal duties, and after a temporary stay in British Columbia, they moved to California, citing what they saw as the media's racist treatment of Meghan and a lack of support from the palace. 

The couple now have two children.

The couple detailed the evolution of the breach in a high-profile interview with Oprah Winfrey and a six-part Netflix documentary. Harry then wrote a memoir, Spare, in which he alleged is older brother William assaulted him in a 2019 incident and called Meghan "difficult," "rude" and "abrasive."

Last year, the High Court in London ruled the decision was lawful and that decision was upheld by three senior Court of Appeal judges.

Judge Geoffrey Vos said Harry's lawyer had made "powerful and moving arguments" about the impact of the decision about his security.

"It was plain that the Duke of Sussex felt badly treated by the system, but I conclude — having studied the detail of the extensive documentation — I could not say that the Duke's sense of grievance translated into a legal argument for the challenge to [the original] decision," he told the court.

Harry attended two days of hearings in person in April, when his lawyer told the court that he had been singled out for different, unjustified and inferior treatment.

His lawyers said al-Qaeda had recently called for him to be murdered and that he and his wife had been involved in "a dangerous car pursuit with paparazzi in New York City" in 2023.

"One must not forget the human dimension to this case: there is a person sitting behind me whose safety, whose security and whose life is at stake," his lawyer Shaheed Fatima told the court as Harry watched on.

With respect to King Charles, Buckingham Place said Friday that he and his wife Queen Camilla will visit Canada from May 26 to May 27.

The monarch's attendance comes after his recent acknowledgement that he is also the King of Canada, a country that U.S. President Donald Trump has made clear he has designs on.

The visit to Canada would be Charles's second overseas trip this year, after his visit to Italy where he held a private meeting with Pope Francis shortly before the pontiff's death.

With files from CBC News

Read Entire Article